On 16/05/16 20:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 18:13, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 16/05/16 19:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> @@ -1996,7 +1997,10 @@ int page_unprotect(target_ulong address, uintptr_t
>>> pc, void *puc)
>>>
>>> /* and since the content will be modified, we m
On 16 May 2016 at 18:13, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 16/05/16 19:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> @@ -1996,7 +1997,10 @@ int page_unprotect(target_ulong address, uintptr_t
>> pc, void *puc)
>>
>> /* and since the content will be modified, we must invalidate
>> the correspon
On 16/05/16 19:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The user-mode-only function tb_invalidate_phys_page() is only
> called from two places:
> * page_unprotect(), which passes in a non-zero pc, a puc pointer
>and the value 'true' for the locked argument
> * page_set_flags(), which passes in a zero pc, a
The user-mode-only function tb_invalidate_phys_page() is only
called from two places:
* page_unprotect(), which passes in a non-zero pc, a puc pointer
and the value 'true' for the locked argument
* page_set_flags(), which passes in a zero pc, a NULL puc pointer
and a 'false' locked argument
