Fam Zheng writes:
> On Tue, 11/01 10:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Fam Zheng writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, 10/28 17:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >> The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
>> >> the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
>> >> superfluous.
On Tue, 11/01 10:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Fam Zheng writes:
>
> > On Fri, 10/28 17:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
> >> the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
> >> superfluous. For reasons I have yet to d
Fam Zheng writes:
> On Fri, 10/28 17:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
>> the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
>> superfluous. For reasons I have yet to determine this also seems to be
>> causing the source p
Fam Zheng writes:
> On Fri, 10/28 17:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
>> the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
>> superfluous. For reasons I have yet to determine this also seems to be
>> causing the source p
On Fri, 10/28 17:33, Alex Bennée wrote:
> The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
> the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
> superfluous. For reasons I have yet to determine this also seems to be
> causing the source preparation step to skip sta
The whole thing is wrapped inside a call quiet-command as well as being
the actual call taking a --quiet argument so the redirect is
superfluous. For reasons I have yet to determine this also seems to be
causing the source preparation step to skip stashing work tree stuff.
Signed-off-by: Alex Benn