On 03/15/2010 03:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/11/2010 08:19 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/11/2010 06:57 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to
Notifiers are data-less callbacks and a notifier list is a list of registered
notifiers that all are interested in a particular event.
We'll use this in a few patches to implement mouse change notification.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
---
v1 -> v2
- Do not do memory allocations by placing li
On 03/11/2010 08:19 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/11/2010 06:57 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to be a QEMUNotifier?
If so
On 03/11/2010 04:54 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to be a QEMUNotifier?
If so, I'm happy to do it.
It's unclear to me why you've invented a new thing in the first place.
This style of callback has a number of advantages:
- It provides better type
On 03/11/2010 08:19 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 03/11/2010 06:57 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to be a QEMUNotifier?
If so
> On 03/11/2010 06:57 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
> >> +struct QEMUNotifier
> >> +{
> >> +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> >> +};
> >
> > I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
>
> I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to be a QEMUNotifier?
> If so, I'm happy to do it.
It's unclea
On 03/11/2010 07:36 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 06:51 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
+
+#ifndef QEMU_NOTIFY_H
+#define QEMU_NOTIFY_H
+
+#include "qemu-queue.h"
+
+typedef struct QEMUNotifier QEMUNotifier;
+typedef struct QEMUNotifierNode QEMUNotifierNode;
+
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void
On 03/11/2010 06:57 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
I take it your not opposed to converting QEMUBH to be a QEMUNotifier?
If so, I'm happy to do it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
P
On 03/10/2010 06:51 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
+
+#ifndef QEMU_NOTIFY_H
+#define QEMU_NOTIFY_H
+
+#include "qemu-queue.h"
+
+typedef struct QEMUNotifier QEMUNotifier;
+typedef struct QEMUNotifierNode QEMUNotifierNode;
+
+struct QEMUNotifier
+{
+void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
+};
+
+s
> +struct QEMUNotifier
> +{
> +void (*notify)(QEMUNotifier *notifier);
> +};
>
I suggest combining this with QEMUBH.
Paul
Notifiers are data-less callbacks and a notifier list is a list of registered
notifiers that all are interested in a particular event.
We'll use this in a few patches to implement mouse change notification.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
---
Makefile.objs |1 +
notify.c | 53
11 matches
Mail list logo
