On 02/17/2012 06:02 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On 02/16/2012 01:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to
Am 24.02.2012 14:05, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On 02/17/2012 06:02 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
So I'd rather drop ICC patch and try your approach with CPU links, I
see no
point in introducing new bus providing we have an alternative model
and existing
bus for the task.
I've looked at device_add
On 02/24/2012 02:30 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
SysBus is supposed to go away in Anthony's upcoming 4th QOM series, so
I'd rather not base a new series on that.
Not sure about that. I haven't understood well the scope of the series,
but I think it only converted buses to QOM, it didn't kill
On 02/24/2012 07:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/24/2012 02:30 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
SysBus is supposed to go away in Anthony's upcoming 4th QOM series, so
I'd rather not base a new series on that.
Not sure about that. I haven't understood well the scope of the series,
but I think it
On 02/24/2012 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I agree with you in principle, but in practice, there is not obvious way
to serialize gpio_in/gpio_out via Visitors. Finding some way to do it
as an integer is clearly wrong IMHO.
%s/gpio_in[%d] % (object_get_canonical_path(...), opaque-n) is
On 02/24/2012 07:50 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/24/2012 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I agree with you in principle, but in practice, there is not obvious way
to serialize gpio_in/gpio_out via Visitors. Finding some way to do it
as an integer is clearly wrong IMHO.
%s/gpio_in[%d] %
On 02/16/2012 01:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold APIC,instead
of sysbus. So we can support
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold APIC,instead
of sysbus. So we can support APIC hot-plug feature.
This is repost of original patch for qemu-kvm rebased on current
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold APIC,instead
of sysbus. So we can support APIC hot-plug feature.
This is repost of original
On 2012-02-16 13:42, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold APIC,instead
of sysbus. So we can support APIC
On 02/16/2012 06:50 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 13:42, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold
On 2012-02-16 13:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 06:50 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 13:42, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/16/2012 05:25 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-02-16 00:16, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER
Introduce a new structure CPUS as the controller of ICC (INTERRUPT
CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS), and new bus ICC to hold APIC,instead
of sysbus. So we can support APIC hot-plug feature.
This is repost of original patch for qemu-kvm rebased on current qemu:
13 matches
Mail list logo
