On 01/08/2016 09:20 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 02:14 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 01/05/2016 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2016 10:29 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>
>>> [meta-comment] Your messages were not marked in-reply-to: the 0/8 cover
>>> letter, but came
On 01/06/2016 02:14 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 01/05/2016 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/05/2016 10:29 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[meta-comment] Your messages were not marked in-reply-to: the 0/8 cover
letter, but came through as separate threads. This makes it harder to
follow,
On 01/05/2016 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 10:29 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>
> [meta-comment] Your messages were not marked in-reply-to: the 0/8 cover
> letter, but came through as separate threads. This makes it harder to
> follow, especially in mail clients that sort top-level
The IPMI BMC simulator populates the SDR table with a set of initial
SDRs. The length of each SDR is taken from the record itself (byte 4)
which does not include the size of the header. But, the full length
(header + data) is required by the sdr_add_entry() routine.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le
On 01/05/2016 10:29 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
[meta-comment] Your messages were not marked in-reply-to: the 0/8 cover
letter, but came through as separate threads. This makes it harder to
follow, especially in mail clients that sort top-level threads by most
recent activity on the thread.
>
