On 10/07/2015 09:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 02:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/07/2015 10:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> +
>>> +/* ??? This variable is somewhat silly. Methinks KVM should be
>>> + using XCR0 to store into the XSTATE_BV field. Either that or
>>
On 07/09/2015 02:15 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/07/2015 10:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
+
+/* ??? This variable is somewhat silly. Methinks KVM should be
+ using XCR0 to store into the XSTATE_BV field. Either that or
+ there's more missing information, e.g. the AVX bits. */
On 09/07/2015 10:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> +
> +/* ??? This variable is somewhat silly. Methinks KVM should be
> + using XCR0 to store into the XSTATE_BV field. Either that or
> + there's more missing information, e.g. the AVX bits. */
> +env->xstate_bv = XSTATE_FP;
>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-i386/cpu.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index c19ff8a..2402c2a 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -2654,7 +2654,17 @@ static void
