On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Evgeniy Dushistov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
>> I'd say it is preferable to split the individual devices and model
>> them using the QDEV infrastructure instead of putting it all together
>> into one "system controller" d
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:39:27AM +0100, Filip Navara wrote:
> I'd say it is preferable to split the individual devices and model
> them using the QDEV infrastructure instead of putting it all together
> into one "system controller" device.
>
> I've QDEV-based implementation of these devices alre
I'd say it is preferable to split the individual devices and model
them using the QDEV infrastructure instead of putting it all together
into one "system controller" device.
I've QDEV-based implementation of these devices already: PMC, DBGU,
PIO, PITC, AIC. That leaves the "bus matrix", SDRAM cont
add emulation of at91sam9263 cpu, plus sdram, plus nor flash connected to this
cpu
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Dushistov
---
Makefile.target |2 +-
hw/at91sam9.c | 695 +
hw/at91sam9263_defs.h | 144 ++
3 files changed, 840
