On 20-03-2012 17:31, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 03:16 PM, Crístian Viana wrote:
>> On 20-03-2012 17:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> I think we just want to change:
>>>
>>> hw/mc146818rtc.h:
>>> DEFINE_PROP_LOSTTICKPOLICY("lost_tick_policy", RTCState,
>>>
On 03/20/2012 03:16 PM, Crístian Viana wrote:
On 20-03-2012 17:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think we just want to change:
hw/mc146818rtc.h:
DEFINE_PROP_LOSTTICKPOLICY("lost_tick_policy", RTCState,
lost_tick_policy, LOST_TICK_DISCARD),
I think we just need t
On 20-03-2012 17:05, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I think we just want to change:
>
> hw/mc146818rtc.h:
> DEFINE_PROP_LOSTTICKPOLICY("lost_tick_policy", RTCState,
>lost_tick_policy, LOST_TICK_DISCARD),
>
> I think we just need to change this to LOST_TICK_SLEW. Thi
On 03/20/2012 02:48 PM, Crístian Viana wrote:
Windows 2008+ is very sensitive to missed ticks. The RTC is used by default as
the time source. If time drift is not enabled, Windows is prone to
blue screening.
Signed-off-by: Crístian Viana
---
vl.c | 13 -
1 files changed, 12 in
Windows 2008+ is very sensitive to missed ticks. The RTC is used by default as
the time source. If time drift is not enabled, Windows is prone to
blue screening.
Signed-off-by: Crístian Viana
---
vl.c | 13 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vl.c b/