On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I see three options:
1. Leave the search.
2. Modify qemu-queue.h to add a QTAILQ_ON_LIST(elm) macro.
3. Break the QTAILQ abstraction and test tge_prev directly.
I see a nicer option: check device_name[0]. Patch v2
Am 10.04.2010 08:04, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I see three options:
1. Leave the search.
2. Modify qemu-queue.h to add a QTAILQ_ON_LIST(elm) macro.
3. Break the QTAILQ abstraction and test tge_prev directly.
I see a
Am 09.04.2010 16:22, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
block.c | 44 +++-
block_int.h |3 ++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
@@ -545,13 +542,15 @@ void bdrv_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
void bdrv_delete(BlockDriverState *bs)
{
- BlockDriverState **pbs;
+ BlockDriverState *bs1;
- pbs = bdrv_first;
- while (*pbs != bs *pbs != NULL)
