On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 14:45 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2015/3/6 20:55, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:23PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> >> Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
On 2015/3/9 18:17, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:45:36PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
[...]
+exit (1);
+}
+} else if (!xlu_cfg_get_string(config, "gfx_passthru", &buf, 0)) {
+if (libxl_gfx_passthru_kind_from_string(buf,
&b_info->u.hvm.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:45:36PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
[...]
> >
> >>+exit (1);
> >>+}
> >>+} else if (!xlu_cfg_get_string(config, "gfx_passthru", &buf, 0)) {
> >>+if (libxl_gfx_passthru_kind_from_string(buf,
> >>&b_info->u.hvm.gfx_passthru_ki
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:50:42PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2015/3/6 20:59, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:18:36PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> >>On 2015/3/6 17:08, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> >>>Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
> >>>after we want
On 2015/3/6 20:59, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:18:36PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2015/3/6 17:08, Tiejun Chen wrote:
Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
type, gfx_passthru_
On 2015/3/6 20:55, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:23PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass I
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:18:36PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> On 2015/3/6 17:08, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> >Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
> >after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
> >type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're try
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:08:23PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
> after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
> type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
> this means we ca
On 2015/3/6 17:08, Tiejun Chen wrote:
Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
this means we can benefit this to support oth
Although we already have 'gfx_passthru' in b_info, this doesn' suffice
after we want to handle IGD specifically. Now we define a new field of
type, gfx_passthru_kind, to indicate we're trying to pass IGD. Actually
this means we can benefit this to support other specific devices just
by extending gf
10 matches
Mail list logo
