Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we sort
the ad-hoc list printed for
qemu-system- -M \?
The GLib documentation is not overly clear if g_slist_sort() allocates a
new list or reorders the input list in place, but:
- it slightly suggests the latter,
- and there
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we sort
the ad-hoc list printed for
qemu-system- -M \?
Agree that the order is worth sanitizing. I would however argue that
registration order is not entirely stable either if
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:04:44PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we sort
the ad-hoc list printed for
qemu-system- -M \?
Agree that the order is worth sanitizing. I would
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we
sort the ad-hoc list printed for
qemu-system- -M \?
Agree that the order is worth sanitizing. I would however argue that
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we
sort the ad-hoc list printed for
qemu-system- -M \?
Agree that
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 15:36 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we
sort the
On 09/22/14 14:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured in the previous patch, we
sort the ad-hoc list printed for
On 09/22/14 14:50, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 15:36 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
Based on the registration order captured
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 15:43 +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:50, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 15:36 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 02:29:08PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/22/14 14:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 22.09.2014 um 13:26
Il 22/09/2014 15:15, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
$ git grep -E '\qemu_register(_pc)?_machine\' | wc -l
115
Even if we just count the clusters, they're way too many:
$ git grep -E '\machine_init\' | wc -l
66
There are just a couple of multi-machine clusters (well, three: pseries,
pc, q35).
Am 22.09.2014 um 17:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 22/09/2014 15:15, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
$ git grep -E '\qemu_register(_pc)?_machine\' | wc -l
115
Even if we just count the clusters, they're way too many:
$ git grep -E '\machine_init\' | wc -l
66
There are just a couple of
On 09/22/14 17:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/09/2014 15:15, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
$ git grep -E '\qemu_register(_pc)?_machine\' | wc -l
115
Even if we just count the clusters, they're way too many:
$ git grep -E '\machine_init\' | wc -l
66
There are just a couple of multi-machine
Il 22/09/2014 18:06, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Am 22.09.2014 um 17:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 22/09/2014 15:15, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
$ git grep -E '\qemu_register(_pc)?_machine\' | wc -l
115
Even if we just count the clusters, they're way too many:
$ git grep -E '\machine_init\' |
13 matches
Mail list logo
