[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-22 Thread Eduardo Otubo
v3 update: - reincluding getrlimit(), it is used by Xen. v2 update: - reincluding setrlimit(), it is used by Xen. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- qemu-seccomp.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-22 Thread Eduardo Otubo
Ended up my tests were inconclusive. So removing this one from this patch. Resubmited a v3 without it. Thanks for pointing that. On 07/16/2013 02:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 16/07/2013 19:45, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: -{ SCMP_SYS(ugetrlimit), 241 }, Xen uses getrlimit, not sure

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-16 Thread Eduardo Otubo
On 07/15/2013 05:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 15/07/2013 19:29, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- qemu-seccomp.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index 1d5fd71..bfd372a 100644 ---

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 16/07/2013 19:45, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: -{ SCMP_SYS(ugetrlimit), 241 }, Xen uses getrlimit, not sure what this one is. Perhaps glibc's wrapper calls it? It seems to be a glibc's wrapper, yes. Removing it anyway. Why if Xen uses it? Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-16 Thread Eduardo Otubo
On 07/16/2013 02:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Il 16/07/2013 19:45, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: -{ SCMP_SYS(ugetrlimit), 241 }, Xen uses getrlimit, not sure what this one is. Perhaps glibc's wrapper calls it? It seems to be a glibc's wrapper, yes. Removing it anyway. Why if Xen uses

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-16 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 16/07/2013 20:55, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: Xen uses getrlimit, not sure what this one is. Perhaps glibc's wrapper calls it? It seems to be a glibc's wrapper, yes. Removing it anyway. Why if Xen uses it? I'm doing virt-test runs since yesterday, it seems it doesn't use it. Did you

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-15 Thread Eduardo Otubo
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- qemu-seccomp.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index 1d5fd71..bfd372a 100644 --- a/qemu-seccomp.c +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-15 Thread Eduardo Otubo
Sorry for the problem on my keyboard: on the subject, please do s/gtom/from On 07/15/2013 02:29 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- qemu-seccomp.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist

2013-07-15 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 15/07/2013 19:29, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com --- qemu-seccomp.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c index 1d5fd71..bfd372a 100644 --- a/qemu-seccomp.c +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c @@