On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 04:33:56PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 30/04/2017 19:25, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > Following up the previous detach_cb change, this patch removes the
> > detach_cb_opaque entirely from the code.
> >
> > The reason is that the drc->detach_cb_opaque object can'
On 30/04/2017 19:25, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Following up the previous detach_cb change, this patch removes the
> detach_cb_opaque entirely from the code.
>
> The reason is that the drc->detach_cb_opaque object can't be
> restored in the post load of the upcoming DRC migration and no deta
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza <
danie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Following up the previous detach_cb change, this patch removes the
> detach_cb_opaque entirely from the code.
>
> The reason is that the drc->detach_cb_opaque object can't be
> restored in the post lo
Following up the previous detach_cb change, this patch removes the
detach_cb_opaque entirely from the code.
The reason is that the drc->detach_cb_opaque object can't be
restored in the post load of the upcoming DRC migration and no detach
callbacks actually need this opaque. 'spapr_core_release' i
