On 2017-06-15 15:10, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> >> A "sane" guest (e.g. Linux) will only use an instruction if the
> >> corresponding stfl(e) bit is set. So in my opinion, this should be just
> >> fine. If the bit is not set currently, the guest will not use it == dead
> >> code.
> >
> > Not
>> A "sane" guest (e.g. Linux) will only use an instruction if the
>> corresponding stfl(e) bit is set. So in my opinion, this should be just
>> fine. If the bit is not set currently, the guest will not use it == dead
>> code.
>
> Not necessarily. Depending on the distribution, gcc and hence
On 2017-06-15 13:28, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.06.2017 09:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-06-14 22:53, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> >> ---
> >> target/s390x/translate.c | 8
> >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>
On 15.06.2017 09:01, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-06-14 22:53, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>> ---
>> target/s390x/translate.c | 8
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c
On 2017-06-14 22:53, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target/s390x/translate.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c b/target/s390x/translate.c
> index af18ffb..48cee25 100644
> ---
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/s390x/translate.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/s390x/translate.c b/target/s390x/translate.c
index af18ffb..48cee25 100644
--- a/target/s390x/translate.c
+++ b/target/s390x/translate.c
@@ -55,6