On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:22:21 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/07/2015 14:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I think for 2.4 it's a good idea to avoid enabling modern interface
> > by default. Therefore, for 2.4 we can keep scsi enabled unless modern
> > is requested by user.
>
> I agree.
On 16/07/2015 14:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think for 2.4 it's a good idea to avoid enabling modern interface
> by default. Therefore, for 2.4 we can keep scsi enabled unless modern
> is requested by user.
I agree.
> I am also fine with just doing
>
> if (modern && scsi)
>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:37:12PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:51:32 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:18 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:51:32 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:18 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Jul
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:38:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:18 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:57 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > >
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:18 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:57 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Fine, but revision is negotiated way before features are
> > > > > > > probed
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:57 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > > > > > Fine, but revision is negotiated way before features are
> > > > > > probed so why does it make a practical difference?
> > > > >
> > > > > Legacy drive
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:57 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > > > > Fine, but revision is negotiated way before features are
> > > > > probed so why does it make a practical difference?
> > > >
> > > > Legacy drivers (that don't know about the set-revision command) will
> > > > read feature
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:40:22PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:16:07 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:43:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:01:01 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:16:07 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:43:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:01:01 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Jul
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:43:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:01:01 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:00 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue,
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:01:01 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:00 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:43:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > > Yes, and that
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:00 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:43:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > Yes, and that's because as written, transitional devices must set
> > > > ANY_LAYOUT, but
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:00 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:43:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > Yes, and that's because as written, transitional devices must set
> > > ANY_LAYOUT, but that's incompatible with scsi.
> >
> > Hm, I had a patch before that dynam
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:43:44PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > Yes, and that's because as written, transitional devices must set
> > ANY_LAYOUT, but that's incompatible with scsi.
>
> Hm, I had a patch before that dynamically allowed different feature
> sets for legacy or modern, not only a su
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:35:53 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:36:00 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:30:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Jul
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:36:00 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:30:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0300
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon,
On 13/07/2015 16:41, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:34:30 +0200
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 13/07/2015 15:20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> This would imply that any transitional device cannot offer scsi,
>>> doesn't it?
>>>
>>> We have two layers interacting here: virtio-blk which ma
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:34:30 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 13/07/2015 15:20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > This would imply that any transitional device cannot offer scsi,
> > doesn't it?
> >
> > We have two layers interacting here: virtio-blk which may or may not
> > offer scsi support, and
On 13/07/2015 15:20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> This would imply that any transitional device cannot offer scsi,
> doesn't it?
>
> We have two layers interacting here: virtio-blk which may or may not
> offer scsi support, and the transport layer which may or may not offer
> VERSION_1 support. Failin
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:36:00 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:30:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:51:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Jul
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:30:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:51:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:56:51 +0200
> > > Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 13.07.2015 um
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:22:52 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:51:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:56:51 +0200
> > Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > > Am 13.07.2015 um 11:00 hat Jason Wang geschrieben:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 07/13/2015 03:46
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:51:56PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:56:51 +0200
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> > Am 13.07.2015 um 11:00 hat Jason Wang geschrieben:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/13/2015 03:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800,
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:56:51 +0200
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 13.07.2015 um 11:00 hat Jason Wang geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > On 07/13/2015 03:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So d
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:00:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/13/2015 03:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So disable it.
> >>
> >> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
> >> Cc: Kevin W
Am 13.07.2015 um 11:00 hat Jason Wang geschrieben:
>
>
> On 07/13/2015 03:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So disable it.
> >>
> >> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
> >> Cc: Kevin Wolf
> >>
On 07/13/2015 03:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So disable it.
>>
>> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
>> Cc: Kevin Wolf
>> Cc: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
> Interestin
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 01:46:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So disable it.
>
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
> Cc: Kevin Wolf
> Cc: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
Interesting, I noticed we have a field scsi - see
commit 1ba1f
VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI was no longer supported in 1.0. So disable it.
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi
Cc: Kevin Wolf
Cc: qemu-bl...@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
---
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
30 matches
Mail list logo