On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 07:41:51 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.09.2017 16:00, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> > returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> > and aborts process.
> > Some users assume that call can't fail and don't check
> >
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 12:15:13 -0300
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 09/04/2017 11:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> > returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> > and aborts process.
> > Some users assume that call can't fail and d
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:19:56 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> > returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> > and aborts process.
> > Some users assume that call can't
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:00:58PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> and aborts process.
> Some users assume that call can't fail and don't check
> for failure, though they should have checked
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 07:41:51AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.09.2017 16:00, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> > returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> > and aborts process.
> > Some users assume that call can't fail and don't che
On 04.09.2017 16:00, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
> returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
> and aborts process.
> Some users assume that call can't fail and don't check
> for failure, though they should have checked for it.
>
> In eithe
On 09/04/2017 11:00 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
and aborts process.
Some users assume that call can't fail and don't check
for failure, though they should have checked for it.
In either cases c
Almost every user of cpu_generic_init() checks for
returned NULL and then reports failure in a custom way
and aborts process.
Some users assume that call can't fail and don't check
for failure, though they should have checked for it.
In either cases cpu_generic_init() failure is fatal,
so instead
