Hello,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> Leave ARM_CP_SVE, removing ARM_CP_FPU; the sve_access_check
> produced by the flag already includes fp_access_check. If
> we also check ARM_CP_FPU the double fp_access_check asserts.
>
> Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues
> Signed-o
On 29 June 2018 at 01:15, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> Leave ARM_CP_SVE, removing ARM_CP_FPU; the sve_access_check
> produced by the flag already includes fp_access_check. If
> we also check ARM_CP_FPU the double fp_access_check asserts.
>
> Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues
> Signed-off-by: Richard
On 06/28/2018 09:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Leave ARM_CP_SVE, removing ARM_CP_FPU; the sve_access_check
> produced by the flag already includes fp_access_check. If
> we also check ARM_CP_FPU the double fp_access_check asserts.
Maybe we can surround this assert() with #ifdef DEBUG_DISAS...
Leave ARM_CP_SVE, removing ARM_CP_FPU; the sve_access_check
produced by the flag already includes fp_access_check. If
we also check ARM_CP_FPU the double fp_access_check asserts.
Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/arm/helper.c| 8
target
