On 04/12/2013 09:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 12/04/2013 15:29, Michael R. Hines ha scritto:
Oh, thank you. Huge bug - I need to introduce a "COMPRESS"
message for this page into the protocol just like we already have
for TCP and bypass the current chunk.
It's okay to send the page uncompres
Il 12/04/2013 15:29, Michael R. Hines ha scritto:
>
> Oh, thank you. Huge bug - I need to introduce a "COMPRESS"
> message for this page into the protocol just like we already have
> for TCP and bypass the current chunk.
It's okay to send the page uncompressed if it's been registered already.
T
On 04/12/2013 07:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 12/04/2013 07:52, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com ha scritto:
+ *
+ * If we're using dynamic registration on the server-side, we have to
+ * send a registration command first.
+ */
+static int __qemu_rdma_write(QEMUFile *f, RDMAContext *rdma,
+i
Il 12/04/2013 07:52, mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com ha scritto:
>
> + *
> + * If we're using dynamic registration on the server-side, we have to
> + * send a registration command first.
> + */
> +static int __qemu_rdma_write(QEMUFile *f, RDMAContext *rdma,
> +int current_index,
> +uint
