Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 24/36] vmstate: port arm cpu

2012-03-21 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela: Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced. Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can use uncached_cpsr for saving state.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 24/36] vmstate: port arm cpu

2012-03-21 Thread Peter Maydell
On 21 March 2012 16:29, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela: Use one subsection for each feature.  This means that we don't need to bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced. Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 24/36] vmstate: port arm cpu

2012-03-21 Thread Juan Quintela
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: Am 19.03.2012 23:57, schrieb Juan Quintela: Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced. Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can use

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 24/36] vmstate: port arm cpu

2012-03-19 Thread Juan Quintela
Use one subsection for each feature. This means that we don't need to bump the version field each time that a new feature gets introduced. Introduce cpsr_vmstate field, as I am not sure if I can use uncached_cpsr for saving state. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela quint...@redhat.com ---