On 2 March 2016 at 00:19, Andrew Baumann wrote:
>> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
>> More interestingly, why can't you just read from the source
>> pointer you're passed in here? The framebuffer_update_display()
>> code should have obtained it by looking up the location of t
> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:23 AM
>
> On 27 February 2016 at 00:16, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
> > The framebuffer occupies the upper portion of memory (64MiB by
> > default), but it can only be controlled/configured via a system
> > mailb
On 27 February 2016 at 00:16, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
> The framebuffer occupies the upper portion of memory (64MiB by
> default), but it can only be controlled/configured via a system
> mailbox or property channel (to be added by a subsequent patch).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann
Mostly looks
The framebuffer occupies the upper portion of memory (64MiB by
default), but it can only be controlled/configured via a system
mailbox or property channel (to be added by a subsequent patch).
Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann
---
hw/arm/bcm2835_peripherals.c | 38 +++-
hw/arm/bcm2836.c