On 05/09/2012 05:54 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
On 05/07/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with these?
The patches shouldn't change any guest facing behavior :o.
My bad,
The problem comes from my
On 05/15/2012 05:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/09/2012 05:54 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
On 05/07/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with these?
The patches shouldn't change any guest facing behavior :o.
My
On 05/15/2012 11:50 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
On 05/15/2012 05:28 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 05/09/2012 05:54 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
On 05/07/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with
these? The patches shouldn't
On 05/07/2012 06:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with these?
The patches shouldn't change any guest facing behavior :o.
My bad,
The problem comes from my initialization of tlb entries at board reset.
I use
Hi Scott,
I'm a little bit late, but this patch is not compatible with e500.
In fact all the modification breaks e500v2 MMU support. What kind PPC
core are you working on?
Regards,
On 07/08/2011 01:44 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
This definition is backward compatible with MAV=1.0 as long as
the
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with these? The
patches shouldn't change any guest facing behavior :o.
Alex
On 07.05.2012, at 17:47, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
Hi Scott,
I'm a little bit late, but this patch is not compatible with e500.
In fact
Am 07.05.2012 18:28, schrieb Alexander Graf:
Hi Fabien,
Could you please elaborate a bit on the case that broke for you with these?
The patches shouldn't change any guest facing behavior :o.
Alex
On 07.05.2012, at 17:47, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
Hi Scott,
I'm a little bit late,
This definition is backward compatible with MAV=1.0 as long as
the guest does not set reserved bits in MAS1/MAS4.
Also, fix the shift in booke206_tlb_to_page_size -- it's the base
that should be able to hold a 4G page size, not the shift count.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
