On 25.04.2014 19:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Copy on Read makes sense on the format level where backing files are
implemented, but it's not required on the protocol level. While it
shouldn't actively break anything to have COR enabled on both layers,
needless serialisation and allocation checks may imp
Copy on Read makes sense on the format level where backing files are
implemented, but it's not required on the protocol level. While it
shouldn't actively break anything to have COR enabled on both layers,
needless serialisation and allocation checks may impact performance.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wo
