On 24.08.19 23:34, Richard Henderson wrote:
> We had two different mechanisms to force a recheck of the tlb.
>
> Before TLB_RECHECK was introduced, we had a PAGE_WRITE_INV bit
> that would immediate set TLB_INVALID_MASK, which automatically
> means that a second check of the tlb entry fails.
>
>
We had two different mechanisms to force a recheck of the tlb.
Before TLB_RECHECK was introduced, we had a PAGE_WRITE_INV bit
that would immediate set TLB_INVALID_MASK, which automatically
means that a second check of the tlb entry fails.
We can use the same mechanism to handle small pages.
Conse
