On 04/25/18 21:08, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/25/2018 02:05 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> + 'x86_64', 'xtensa', 'xtensaeb' ] }
x86_64 doesn't match our typical conventions of preferring '-' over '_';
also, wikipedia mentions both spellings but under the page name
On 04/25/2018 02:05 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
+ 'x86_64', 'xtensa', 'xtensaeb' ] }
>>>
>>> x86_64 doesn't match our typical conventions of preferring '-' over '_';
>>> also, wikipedia mentions both spellings but under the page name
>>> 'x86-64'. Is it worth switching that enum
On 04/25/18 14:54, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:11:05PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets
>>> that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to
>>>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:11:05PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets
> > that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to
> > "common.json".
> >
> > Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange"
On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets
> that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to
> "common.json".
>
> Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> Cc: David Gibson
> Cc:
We'll soon need an enumeration type that lists all the softmmu targets
that QEMU (the project) supports. Introduce @SysEmuTarget to
"common.json".
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange"
Cc: David Gibson
Cc: Eric Blake
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann