Eric Blake writes:
> On 09/18/2015 06:00 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> The test doesn't check the output makes any sense, only that QEMU
>
> Reads slightly better as:
> s/check/check that/
Okay.
>> survives. Useful since we've had an astounding number of crash bugs
>> around there.
>>
>> In
On 09/18/2015 06:00 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The test doesn't check the output makes any sense, only that QEMU
Reads slightly better as:
s/check/check that/
> survives. Useful since we've had an astounding number of crash bugs
> around there.
>
> In fact, we have a bunch of them right now
The test doesn't check the output makes any sense, only that QEMU
survives. Useful since we've had an astounding number of crash bugs
around there.
In fact, we have a bunch of them right now: several devices crash or
hang, and all CPUs leave a dangling pointer behind. Blacklist them in
the test.
