On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> it keeps the legacy behavior for all users that doesn't care
> about stable cpu_index value, but would allow boards that
> would support device_add/device_del to set stable cpu_index
> that won't depend on order in which cpus are crea
it keeps the legacy behavior for all users that doesn't care
about stable cpu_index value, but would allow boards that
would support device_add/device_del to set stable cpu_index
that won't depend on order in which cpus are created/destroyed.
While at that simplify cpu_get_free_index() as cpu_inde
