On 24/06/2015 14:48, Andreas Färber wrote:
> I was expecting you to handle cpu_exec_init() through your x86 tree, but
> seems that didn't happen. I am going through CPU patches today, so could
> take open series but then would need to pick up the ENV_* stuff too,
> which I thought would go throug
Am 05.06.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:51:41PM +0900, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 25.05.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>>> The callers (most of them in target-foo/cpu.c) to this function all
>>> have the cpu pointer handy. Just pass it to avoid an ENV
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:51:41PM +0900, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.05.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> > The callers (most of them in target-foo/cpu.c) to this function all
> > have the cpu pointer handy. Just pass it to avoid an ENV_GET_CPU from
> > core code (in exec.c).
[...]
> Re
Am 25.05.2015 um 15:22 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> The callers (most of them in target-foo/cpu.c) to this function all
> have the cpu pointer handy. Just pass it to avoid an ENV_GET_CPU from
> core code (in exec.c).
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
> Cc: Richard Henderson
> Cc: Peter Maydell
> Cc: "Edgar
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:22:25PM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> The callers (most of them in target-foo/cpu.c) to this function all
> have the cpu pointer handy. Just pass it to avoid an ENV_GET_CPU from
> core code (in exec.c).
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini
> Cc: Richard Henderson
> Cc: Peter Mayd
The callers (most of them in target-foo/cpu.c) to this function all
have the cpu pointer handy. Just pass it to avoid an ENV_GET_CPU from
core code (in exec.c).
Cc: Paolo Bonzini
Cc: Richard Henderson
Cc: Peter Maydell
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
Cc: "Andreas Färber"
Cc: Eduardo Habkost
Cc: Mich
