> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony PERARD [mailto:anthony.per...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 17 June 2019 18:37
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Stefano Stabellini
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen: Avoid VLA
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:39:09PM
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:39:09PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > @@ -632,6 +633,8 @@ static void xen_sync_dirty_bitmap(XenIOState *state,
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > +bitmap = g_new0(unsigned long, bitmap_size);
> > +
>
> How hot is this function? It looks (unsurprisingly) like t
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony PERARD [mailto:anthony.per...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 17 June 2019 16:41
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Anthony Perard
> ; Stefano Stabellini
> ; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xen: Avoid VLA
>
> Avoid using a varia
Avoid using a variable length array.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
Notes:
Was suggested by Peter here:
"should we try to stop using variable length arrays?"
hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hv
