Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head this
is already just object_class_foreach() / object_class_by_name(), similar
to CPUs on my qom-cpu branch.
Andreas
---
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
---
hw/boards.h |3 ++-
vl.c| 16 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/boards.h b/hw/boards.h
index 342a774..1eb8314 100644
--- a/hw/boards.h
+++ b/hw/boards.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
Am 24.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:21:56 +0100
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 24.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:23:43 +0100
Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 24.02.2012 15:13, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com
Unless this fixes a bug, I'd rather not refactor this as in my head this
is already just object_class_foreach() /