On 09/10/12 09:40, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
to be added when making some changes. Keeping the data in the C source
code should make it simpler to handle those details.
Am 10.09.2012 17:07, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 10.09.2012 16:50, schrieb Don Slutz:
>>> On 09/10/12 09:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
But question unrelated to this patch is still stand if ia64 is valid
bit for
01.EDX[3
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:58:39PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 10.09.2012 16:50, schrieb Don Slutz:
> > On 09/10/12 09:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> But question unrelated to this patch is still stand if ia64 is valid
> >> bit for
> >> 01.EDX[30]?
> >>
> >>
> > Intel® Processor Identification
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:04:30PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:31:49 +0200
> Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:18:38 +0200
> > Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
> > > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
> > > > Those models are
Am 10.09.2012 16:50, schrieb Don Slutz:
> On 09/10/12 09:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> But question unrelated to this patch is still stand if ia64 is valid
>> bit for
>> 01.EDX[30]?
>>
>>
> Intel® Processor Identification
> and the CPUID Instruction
> Application Note 485
> January 2006
>
> Order Nu
On 09/10/12 09:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:31:49 +0200
Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:18:38 +0200
Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
to be a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
> to be added when making some changes. Keeping the data in the C source
> code should make it simpler to handle those details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
>
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:31:49 +0200
Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:18:38 +0200
> Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
> > > to be added when makin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:18:38 +0200
Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
> > to be added when making some changes. Keeping the data in the C source
> > code should make it s
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:41:10 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
> to be added when making some changes. Keeping the data in the C source
> code should make it simpler to handle those details.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
>
Those models are maintained by QEMU and may require compatibility code
to be added when making some changes. Keeping the data in the C source
code should make it simpler to handle those details.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
---
sysconfigs/target/cpus-x86_64.conf | 129 +-
t
11 matches
Mail list logo