On Mar 4, 2016 04:41, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Any thoughts about patch 7?
>
> Paolo
I think I like my version, since it unifies the code testing and setting the bit. I was planning to refresh the series on Saturday; feel free to do a pull request earlier if you want.
r~
On 03/03/2016 20:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 02:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Do you want LOG_UNIMP or LOG_GUEST_ERROR?
>>
>> I would actually use LOG_IN_ASM. As you noticed, guests sometimes use
>> illegal opcodes; another example is Xen's hypercall interface.
>>
>> On 03/03/
On 03/03/2016 20:06, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/03/2016 02:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Do you want LOG_UNIMP or LOG_GUEST_ERROR?
>>
>> I would actually use LOG_IN_ASM. As you noticed, guests sometimes use
>> illegal opcodes; another example is Xen's hypercall interface.
>>
>> On 03/03/
On 03/03/2016 02:08 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Do you want LOG_UNIMP or LOG_GUEST_ERROR?
I would actually use LOG_IN_ASM. As you noticed, guests sometimes use
illegal opcodes; another example is Xen's hypercall interface.
On 03/03/2016 07:57, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
This patch is not quiet on
> Do you want LOG_UNIMP or LOG_GUEST_ERROR?
I would actually use LOG_IN_ASM. As you noticed, guests sometimes use
illegal opcodes; another example is Xen's hypercall interface.
On 03/03/2016 07:57, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> This patch is not quiet on some operating systems:
> OS/2:
> ILLOPC: 00
Le 03/03/2016 06:30, Richard Henderson a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-i386/translate.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/translate.c b/target-i386/translate.c
index b73c237..aa423cb 100644
--- a/targe
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-i386/translate.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/translate.c b/target-i386/translate.c
index b73c237..aa423cb 100644
--- a/target-i386/translate.c
+++ b/target-i386/translate.c
@@ -