On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:54:38AM -0800, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
> >> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015 23:40
> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Baumann
> >> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 December 2015 at 18:54, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Baumann
>> wrote:
From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
Is that more likely to be an IP connectivity problem (
> From: Peter Maydell [mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 December 2015 13:01
> On 9 December 2015 at 18:54, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Baumann
> > wrote:
> >>> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> >>> Is that
On 9 December 2015 at 18:54, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
>>> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
>>> Is that more likely to be an IP connectivity problem (wierd input to
>>> the card-detect pin in the SoC)?
>>
>> That
> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 December 2015 10:55
> > Yes, that's the same change I made. Is it going to be applied?
> >
>
> It missed the boat for 2.5, but you could help by putting a tested-by
> or reviewed-by to the patch.
Ok.
> > The compl
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
>> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015 23:40
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Baumann
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent:
> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 December 2015 23:40
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Baumann
> wrote:
> >> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, 5 December 2015 21:26
> >> Is this IP just SDHCI? We
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
>> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, 5 December 2015 21:26
>> Is this IP just SDHCI? We already model SDHCI in QEMU, see
>> hw/sd/sdhci.c. If there are RPi specific features to the SDHCI
>> implemen
> From: Peter Crosthwaite [mailto:crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 5 December 2015 21:26
> Is this IP just SDHCI? We already model SDHCI in QEMU, see
> hw/sd/sdhci.c. If there are RPi specific features to the SDHCI
> implementation they should be added as optional extensions (probababl
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Andrew Baumann
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann
> ---
> hw/sd/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> hw/sd/bcm2835_emmc.c | 800
> +++
> include/hw/sd/bcm2835_emmc.h | 56 +++
> 3 files changed, 857 insertions(+)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Baumann
---
hw/sd/Makefile.objs | 1 +
hw/sd/bcm2835_emmc.c | 800 +++
include/hw/sd/bcm2835_emmc.h | 56 +++
3 files changed, 857 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 hw/sd/bcm2835_emmc.c
create mode 100644 include/h
11 matches
Mail list logo
