On 14 May 2014 23:58, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> An old host kernel, or an old guest kernel? The former is fine,
>> because the KVM CPU init code will just ask for the KVM
>> capability and fill in the ARMCPU field appropriately.
>> For the la
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 14 May 2014 20:15, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> My suggestion to Pranav was that we abstract away the "which PSCI
>>> version?" decision into a field in ARMCPU, in which case we can
On 14 May 2014 20:15, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> My suggestion to Pranav was that we abstract away the "which PSCI
>> version?" decision into a field in ARMCPU, in which case we can
>> just have TCG always set it to 0.2. So some of this logic
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 5 May 2014 17:00, Rob Herring wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring
>>
>> Now that we have PSCI emulation, enable it for the virt platform.
>> This simplifies the virt machine a bit now that PSCI and SMP no longer
>> need to be KVM only features.
On 5 May 2014 17:00, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring
>
> Now that we have PSCI emulation, enable it for the virt platform.
> This simplifies the virt machine a bit now that PSCI and SMP no longer
> need to be KVM only features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
> ---
>
> Note: This will need
From: Rob Herring
Now that we have PSCI emulation, enable it for the virt platform.
This simplifies the virt machine a bit now that PSCI and SMP no longer
need to be KVM only features.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
Note: This will need to be rebased as comments on KVM PSCI 0.2 support
are ad
