On 6 May 2015 at 19:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 08:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> This is making the assumption that what the disassembler sees as
>> a "different mode" is the same as what the translator sees as a
>> "different mode" for which it needs to end the TB... This happen
On 05/06/2015 08:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 May 2015 at 15:12, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 05/06/2015 12:06 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> Can
>>> we rely on the env/CPUState always being up to date during
>>> target_disas (which happens at translate time?) or will we need to go
>>> f
On 6 May 2015 at 15:12, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 12:06 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> Can
>> we rely on the env/CPUState always being up to date during
>> target_disas (which happens at translate time?) or will we need to go
>> field by field to make sure any env updates explicitl
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/05/2015 16:12, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> Can
> >> > we rely on the env/CPUState always being up to date during
> >> > target_disas (which happens at translate time?) or will we need to go
> >> > field by field to make sure any env updates explici
On 05/06/2015 12:06 AM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Can
> we rely on the env/CPUState always being up to date during
> target_disas (which happens at translate time?) or will we need to go
> field by field to make sure any env updates explicitly occur before
> target_disas?
I *think* so, but it's a
On 06/05/2015 16:12, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Can
>> > we rely on the env/CPUState always being up to date during
>> > target_disas (which happens at translate time?) or will we need to go
>> > field by field to make sure any env updates explicitly occur before
>> > target_disas?
> I *think* s
On 05/05/2015 11:57 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> So I have made a start on this. The ARM, MB and CRIS in this patch
> series is rather easy. Its X86 im having trouble with but your example
> here looks like most of the work ...
>
>> Indeed, the flags setup becomes less obscure when, instead of
>
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 10:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 May 2015 at 05:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
>>> disassembled from the monitor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Cr
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 10:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 May 2015 at 05:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
>>> disassembled from the monitor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Cr
On 05/05/2015 10:19 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 May 2015 at 05:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
>> disassembled from the monitor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
>> ---
>> monitor.c | 11 +++
>> 1 file change
On 5 May 2015 at 05:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
> disassembled from the monitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> ---
> monitor.c | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monit
On 05.05.2015 06:45, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
> disassembled from the monitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> ---
> monitor.c | 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor
Add the ARM specific disassembly flags setup, so ARM can be correctly
disassembled from the monitor.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
---
monitor.c | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index d831d98..9d9f1e2 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
13 matches
Mail list logo
