On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:02:17 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:39:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:21:20 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:08:05PM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > Use build_append_
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:39:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:21:20 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:08:05PM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Use build_append_namestring() instead of build_append_nameseg()
> > > So user won't have to c
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 22:21:20 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:08:05PM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Use build_append_namestring() instead of build_append_nameseg()
> > So user won't have to care whether name is NameSeg, NamePath or
> > NameString.
> >
> > See for r
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:08:05PM +, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Use build_append_namestring() instead of build_append_nameseg()
> So user won't have to care whether name is NameSeg, NamePath or
> NameString.
>
> See for refernce ACPI 5.0: 20.2.2 Name Objects Encoding
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mamm
Use build_append_namestring() instead of build_append_nameseg()
So user won't have to care whether name is NameSeg, NamePath or
NameString.
See for refernce ACPI 5.0: 20.2.2 Name Objects Encoding
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov
---
hw/acpi/acpi_gen_utils.c | 86