On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 09:46:52PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:57, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
testing patch not
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:57, David Gibson da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
testing patch not meant to go into the main series.
Actually I'm not sure what would be
---
dma.h |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dma.h b/dma.h
index b8cfd1d..ee540f4 100644
--- a/dma.h
+++ b/dma.h
@@ -18,10 +18,13 @@
typedef struct ScatterGatherEntry ScatterGatherEntry;
#if defined(TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_BITS)
-typedef
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:27:43PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
Oops, ignore this one folks. As is probably obvious, this was a
testing patch not meant to go into the main series.
---
dma.h |9 ++---
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dma.h b/dma.h
index
