On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:18:16PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Checking that we don't try for idx != [01] is trivial. Checking
> that we don't issue more than one of any index requires a tad
> more data and some ifdefs protecting that new variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> Cc
On 09/22/2012 04:18 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Checking that we don't try for idx != [01] is trivial. Checking
> that we don't issue more than one of any index requires a tad
> more data and some ifdefs protecting that new variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> Cc: Max Filippov
>
Checking that we don't try for idx != [01] is trivial. Checking
that we don't issue more than one of any index requires a tad
more data and some ifdefs protecting that new variable.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
Cc: Max Filippov
---
tcg/tcg-op.h | 11 +--
tcg/tcg.c| 4
tcg