On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:41:36AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:35:47PM -0600, mmogi...@miniinfo.net wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> > >> Make git_get_out() consist
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:35:47PM -0600, mmogi...@miniinfo.net wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> >> Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
> >> doesn't affect IRQ0, but
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
>> Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
>> doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
>> This makes it consistent with pro
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
> Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
> doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
> This makes it consistent with proposed changes in qemu's i8254 model
> as well.
>
> See http:
Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
This makes it consistent with proposed changes in qemu's i8254 model
as well.
See http://bochs.sourceforge.net/techspec/intel-82c54-timer.pdf.gz
or search the net f