On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:41:36AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:35:47PM -0600, mmogi...@miniinfo.net wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
Make git_get_out()
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
This makes it consistent with proposed changes in qemu's i8254 model
as well.
See
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
This makes it consistent
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:35:47PM -0600, mmogi...@miniinfo.net wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:04:03 +0200, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:39:54PM -0700, Matthew Ogilvie wrote:
Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
doesn't affect
Make git_get_out() consistent with spec. Currently pit_get_out()
doesn't affect IRQ0, but it can be read by the guest in other ways.
This makes it consistent with proposed changes in qemu's i8254 model
as well.
See http://bochs.sourceforge.net/techspec/intel-82c54-timer.pdf.gz
or search the net
