On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/22/2015 05:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Virtio 1 requires this,
>
> I think you mean transitional not virtio 1?
>
> > and all devices are clean by now,
> > so let's do it!
> >
> > Exceptions:
> > - virtio-blk
>
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 22.07.2015 um 11:36 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > Virtio 1 requires this, and all devices are clean by now,
> > so let's do it!
> >
> > Exceptions:
> > - virtio-blk
> > - compat machine types
>
> Is this targett
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:36:22 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> Virtio 1 requires this, and all devices are clean by now,
> so let's do it!
>
> Exceptions:
> - virtio-blk
> - compat machine types
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> Untested - consider this pseudo-code - i
Am 22.07.2015 um 11:36 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> Virtio 1 requires this, and all devices are clean by now,
> so let's do it!
>
> Exceptions:
> - virtio-blk
> - compat machine types
Is this targetted for 2.4 or 2.5? Pushing all the 1.0 stuff in 2.4 while
in hard freeze seems a bit dang
On 07/22/2015 05:36 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Virtio 1 requires this,
I think you mean transitional not virtio 1?
> and all devices are clean by now,
> so let's do it!
>
> Exceptions:
> - virtio-blk
> - compat machine types
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> Unteste
Virtio 1 requires this, and all devices are clean by now,
so let's do it!
Exceptions:
- virtio-blk
- compat machine types
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
Untested - consider this pseudo-code - it just seems easier to write it
in C than try to explain it.
include/hw/compat.h
