On 05/31/2016 04:44 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:15PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 05/30/2016 04:43 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:01:28PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
This is a proposal on how to create the iommu with
'-device intel-iommu' instead
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:15PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 04:43 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:01:28PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>This is a proposal on how to create the iommu with
> >>'-device intel-iommu' instead of '-machine,iommu=on'.
> >>
>
On 05/30/2016 04:43 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:01:28PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
This is a proposal on how to create the iommu with
'-device intel-iommu' instead of '-machine,iommu=on'.
The device is part of the machine properties because we wanted
to ensure it is
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:01:28PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> This is a proposal on how to create the iommu with
> '-device intel-iommu' instead of '-machine,iommu=on'.
>
> The device is part of the machine properties because we wanted
> to ensure it is created before any other PCI device.
This is a proposal on how to create the iommu with
'-device intel-iommu' instead of '-machine,iommu=on'.
The device is part of the machine properties because we wanted
to ensure it is created before any other PCI device.
The alternative is to skip the bus_master_enable_region at
the time the
