On 17 February 2012 13:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 17.02.2012 10:59, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
>> On 3 February 2012 03:59, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> No other emulated CPU uses this at this time.
>>
>> But why does this code better fit in hw/ than target-arm? The iwMMXt
>> registers are cor
Am 17.02.2012 10:59, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
> On 3 February 2012 03:59, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> No other emulated CPU uses this at this time.
>
> But why does this code better fit in hw/ than target-arm? The iwMMXt
> registers are core registers after all.
It seems you've misread somethin
On 3 February 2012 03:59, Andreas Färber wrote:
> No other emulated CPU uses this at this time.
But why does this code better fit in hw/ than target-arm? The iwMMXt
registers are core registers after all.
Also the defines let the board code request a cpu revision by name
instead of using a magi
No other emulated CPU uses this at this time.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
Cc: Peter Maydell
Cc: Andrzej Zaborowski
---
target-arm/cpu.c| 14 ++
target-arm/cpu.h|6 --
target-arm/helper.c |8
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff -
