On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:19:17 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:52:51 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > @@ -748,6 +756,1
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:52:51 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> > > index 43b7e02..1e2a72
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:52:51 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> > index 43b7e02..1e2a720 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > void virtio_queue_s
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > > {
> > > +/*
> > > + *
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > {
> > +/*
> > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > + * upda
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> {
> +/*
> + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> + * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
Where does it say that?
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:54:44 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:46:28 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > pa == -1ULL tricks look quite ugly.
> > Can't we set desc/avail/used unconditionally, and drop
> > the pa value?
>
> And have virtio_queue_get_addr() return desc? Let me
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:46:28 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't
> > require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area:
> > add virtio_q
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't
> require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area:
> add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up.
>
> Signed-off-by:
For virtio-1 devices, we allow a more complex queue layout that doesn't
require descriptor table and rings on a physically-contigous memory area:
add virtio_queue_set_rings() to allow transports to set this up.
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck
---
hw/virtio/virtio.c | 16
11 matches
Mail list logo
