Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 10/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call

2014-12-04 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:00:18PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: From: Thomas Huth th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Handle the virtio-ccw revision according to what the guest sets. When revision 1 is selected, we have a virtio-1 standard device with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 10/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call

2014-12-04 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:20:05 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:00:18PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: From: Thomas Huth th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Handle the virtio-ccw revision according to what the guest sets. When revision 1 is selected, we have a

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 10/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call

2014-12-02 Thread Cornelia Huck
From: Thomas Huth th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com Handle the virtio-ccw revision according to what the guest sets. When revision 1 is selected, we have a virtio-1 standard device with byteswapping for the virtio rings. When a channel gets disabled, we have to revert to the legacy behavior in case the