At Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:22:31 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> On 12/17/2012 11:43 AM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> > send_pending_req() needs to be called even in error case. Rather than
> > moving the error check, I think it looks better to update
> > s->inode.data_vdi_id only when rsp.result is SD_RES_SU
On 12/17/2012 11:43 AM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> send_pending_req() needs to be called even in error case. Rather than
> moving the error check, I think it looks better to update
> s->inode.data_vdi_id only when rsp.result is SD_RES_SUCCESS.
Why can't we check the rsp.result in the first place? d
At Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:59:12 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
>
> From: Liu Yuan
>
> For the error case such as SD_RES_NO_SPACE, we shouldn't update the inode
> bitmap
> to avoid the scenario that the object is allocated but wasn't created at the
> server side. This will result in VM's IO error on the fa
From: Liu Yuan
For the error case such as SD_RES_NO_SPACE, we shouldn't update the inode bitmap
to avoid the scenario that the object is allocated but wasn't created at the
server side. This will result in VM's IO error on the failed object.
Cc: MORITA Kazutaka
Cc: Kevin Wolf
Signed-off-by: Li
