On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:42:28PM +, Auld, Will wrote:
> Gleb, Marcelo,
>
> Sorry Gleb, I did not see comments from you but I have now found them. In
> doing so I also found one form Marcelo that I missed.
>
> What I believe is now outstanding to be addressed are:
> >From Gleb:
> - You've
Gleb, Marcelo,
Sorry Gleb, I did not see comments from you but I have now found them. In doing
so I also found one form Marcelo that I missed.
What I believe is now outstanding to be addressed are:
>From Gleb:
- You've changed function pointer signature here, but emulator_set_msr()
remained th
Comments are still not addressed.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:40:51AM -0800, Will Auld wrote:
> In order to track who initiated the call (host or guest) to modify an msr
> value I have changed function call parameters along the call path. The
> specific change is to add a struct pointer parameter t
In order to track who initiated the call (host or guest) to modify an msr
value I have changed function call parameters along the call path. The
specific change is to add a struct pointer parameter that points to (index,
data, caller) information rather than having this information passed as
indivi
