On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:19:21PM +, Auld, Will wrote:
> Gleb,
>
> This last change to emulator_set_msr() was wrong as you point out. I will
> change it back to what it was in V3 with the exception of fixing the bool
> that Marcelo pointed out.
>
> However, the change of:
>
> struct kvm_
Gleb,
This last change to emulator_set_msr() was wrong as you point out. I will
change it back to what it was in V3 with the exception of fixing the bool that
Marcelo pointed out.
However, the change of:
struct kvm_x86_ops {...
int (*set_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *ms
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:35:07PM -0800, Will Auld wrote:
> In order to track who initiated the call (host or guest) to modify an msr
> value I have changed function call parameters along the call path. The
> specific change is to add a struct pointer parameter that points to (index,
> data, calle
In order to track who initiated the call (host or guest) to modify an msr
value I have changed function call parameters along the call path. The
specific change is to add a struct pointer parameter that points to (index,
data, caller) information rather than having this information passed as
indivi
