Wenchao Xia wenchaoq...@gmail.com writes:
This series address two issues:
1. support using enum as discriminator in union.
For example, if we have following define in qapi schema:
{ 'enum': 'EnumOne',
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2', 'value3' ] }
{ 'type': 'UserDefBase0',
'data': {
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0100
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Wenchao Xia wenchaoq...@gmail.com writes:
This series address two issues:
1. support using enum as discriminator in union.
For example, if we have following define in qapi schema:
{ 'enum': 'EnumOne',
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0100
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
[]
Applies cleanly on Luiz's queue/qmp branch.
I got a few questions on 04/10, but nothing major. Perhaps you'd like
to respin to address the nits picked by
δΊ 2014/3/4 21:53, Markus Armbruster ει:
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0100
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
[]
Applies cleanly on Luiz's queue/qmp branch.
I got a few questions on 04/10, but nothing major. Perhaps you'd like
to
Markus, do you like the way this version works?
Wenchao Xia wenchaoq...@gmail.com writes:
Markus, do you like the way this version works?
I hope to review it early next week.
This series address two issues:
1. support using enum as discriminator in union.
For example, if we have following define in qapi schema:
{ 'enum': 'EnumOne',
'data': [ 'value1', 'value2', 'value3' ] }
{ 'type': 'UserDefBase0',
'data': { 'base-string0': 'str', 'base-enum0': 'EnumOne' } }