Thanks, I'll rename the patch in the next version
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Same subject-prefix as commented by Andreas. Should be target-arm.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Alistair Francis
alistair.fran...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alistair Francis
alistair.fran...@xilinx.com wrote:
Thanks, I'll rename the patch in the next version
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Same subject-prefix as commented by Andreas. Should be target-arm.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Alistair Francis
alistair.fran...@xilinx.com wrote:
Thanks, I'll rename the patch in the next version
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
Same subject-prefix as commented by Andreas. Should be target-arm.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Alistair Francis
alistair.fran...@xilinx.com wrote:
This patch implements the ARM PMCCNTR register including
the disable and reset components of the PMCR register.
Signed-off-by: Alistair
This patch implements the ARM PMCCNTR register including
the disable and reset components of the PMCR register.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis alistair.fran...@xilinx.com
---
This patch assumes that non-invasive debugging is not permitted
when determining if the counter is disabled
V3: Fixed up
