On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:51:22AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 00:14:18 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > While refactoring i386/FADT generation to build_append_int_noprefix()
> > >
> >
On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 00:14:18 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > While refactoring i386/FADT generation to build_append_int_noprefix()
> >
> > and testing it, It turned out that FADT is only tested for valid
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:40:47PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> While refactoring i386/FADT generation to build_append_int_noprefix()
>
> and testing it, It turned out that FADT is only tested for valid
>
> checksum but actual test for unintended changes isn't applie
While refactoring i386/FADT generation to build_append_int_noprefix()
and testing it, It turned out that FADT is only tested for valid
checksum but actual test for unintended changes isn't applied to it
even though we have reference tables in tree.