On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:43:35PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.11.2017 um 15:35 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> > On Thu 30 Nov 2017 01:27:32 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >
> > >> Destroying a paused block job during bdrv_reopen_multiple() has two
> > >> consequences:
> > >>
> > >>1) Th
Am 30.11.2017 um 15:35 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> On Thu 30 Nov 2017 01:27:32 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> >> Destroying a paused block job during bdrv_reopen_multiple() has two
> >> consequences:
> >>
> >>1) The references to the nodes involved in the job are released,
> >> pos
On Thu 30 Nov 2017 01:27:32 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Destroying a paused block job during bdrv_reopen_multiple() has two
>> consequences:
>>
>>1) The references to the nodes involved in the job are released,
>> possibly destroying some of them. If those nodes were in the
>> re
Am 29.11.2017 um 18:56 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben:
> Starting from commit 40840e419be31e6a32e6ea24511c74b389d5e0e4 we are
> pausing all block jobs during bdrv_reopen_multiple() to prevent any of
> them from finishing and removing nodes from the graph while they are
> being reopened.
>
> It tur
Starting from commit 40840e419be31e6a32e6ea24511c74b389d5e0e4 we are
pausing all block jobs during bdrv_reopen_multiple() to prevent any of
them from finishing and removing nodes from the graph while they are
being reopened.
It turns out that pausing a block job doesn't necessarily prevent it
from
